I think by now you know how I feel about terrorists.
As for the feeble attempt at humor, I got it, that is why I was laughing, and
that is why I couldn't resist replying to your post.
My question about engage in was pertaining to coprophagous.
My question about visiting was for Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagunga.
But it isn't really that important Shadow.
As for seeing that, it was tongue-in-cheek, I think I can definately force myself to pass on that.
But thanks for the offer any way. LOL
Shadow wrote:Samurai - Obviously you missed my feeble attempt at humor. I really didn't expect a specific reply, however - I wouldn't know it was filtered until "after posting". So yes, it was obvious, albeit after the fact.
No I don't use these words in "everday language".. But, saying someone has a marked propensity for coprophagous (on a conference call, for example), usually has everyone running for the dictionary. Barry O has a marked propensity for coprophagous. Wouldn't you agree?
"engaged in, or visited one of these - What??
Lastly, What would you like to see?? Maybe I can help...




